Rootless

Rootless is a scheme designed and implemented by the Procursus project. Since the very start of jailbreaking, packages have always been installed directly to the system partition of the device. This had advantages in ensuring package files are organised in expected locations in the filesystem, typically in /Applications, /Library, and /usr, allowing sandbox rules to work as intended. This mixed user-installed packages with the base operating system install, and write access to the system volume is now mitigated by the implementation of Sealed System Volume in iOS 15. Rootless moves all jailbreak packages to /var/jb, predominantly as a long-term solution to the problem posed by SSV. Rootless is implemented starting with palera1n 2.0.

/var/jb
/var/jb is a symbolic link to a path located at /private/preboot/''$boot-manifest-hash. '/procursus. The goal of this is two-fold: to install to a path that is writable, but not affected by sandbox rules that forbid the execution of binaries in /var, and to allow the link to be quickly and safely deleted to evade jailbreak detection.

Dilemmas
Since the introduction of SSV security mechanisms in iOS 15, jailbreak development has encountered many great challenges and difficulties. However with the efforts of developers such as @xina520 and @opa334, we have seen a new dawn. They use a rootless mechanism in their jailbreaks to successfully avoid the security measures that SSV proposes, which also makes jailbreaking enter a new era.

But for the  root path, many people have been very worried about that rootless jailbreak stores all data and files in it, it is a completely fixed path. All jailbreak apps, daemon, tweaks will refer to this path, and hardcode into the final released binary.

is the main directory for a rootless jailbreak, once the jailbreak community in the rootless era forms this specification, it is very difficult for anyone to change and adjust it.

However this fixed path is very easy to be detected, only one line of code is needed to call the access/stat function in order to detect it, any iOS development rookie can do it. Although we can bypass this via temporarily removing the  symlink (like XinaA15), however this is a very lazy and bad method. Doing it like this will cause two main issues that will cause major trouble in the future:


 * It becomes repeatedly annoying for end-users when they have to remove & restore it upon opening different apps, and those users will get tired of it fairly quickly.


 * Most to almost all jailbreak apps, daemons, tweaks, will all use this path. Upon temporarily removing it, maybe a jailbreak app, daemon, tweak that are accessing this path or is about to access this path will fail or error. This creates a confusing situation which can cause the device to panic and corrupt data.

However there are better ways to better fix this issue: First we add a random suffix to the  path, like , and then use environment variables as the rootless jailbreak interface. For example: we create an environment variable named  and set it to , then we can also easily access it via: -- in shell code:

in Objective-C code:

in C/C++ code: --

So what is the difference between this method and the fixed path ? The difference is that the fixed path of  is visible to all processes, but environment variables can be set individually for each process. In the future, we can create a blacklist, and we can choose to hide the  environment variable for some apps. In this way, they will not be able to detect the existence of, and will not interfere with other rootless jailbreak apps/daemon/tweak's access to.

''' Why is hiding /var/jb so important? ''' First of all, the data in the file system is the easiest to detect. as said before, any rookie in iOS development can detect the existence of  with a single line of code. This will make the detection of  very widespread and ubiquitous, eventually a large number of apps will detect this path, making jailbreaking difficult to use if you don't handle.

Secondly, the  path is used as the interface standard for rootless jailbreaks, and every jailbreak app/daemon/tweak will use it, and it is hardcoded into the released binary. This means that if we do not deal with it now, we will not be able to deal with this problem in the future as time goes on. Over the period of time that jailbreaking has been in existence, we have witnessed the brilliance of jailbreak from iOS 5 to iOS 9, and also witnessed the wisdom of the community starting from iOS 10, and then again in iOS 15. Jailbreaking has started to enter a new era, and everyone in the jailbreak community should need to consider more about this problem.

Packaging
Packages intended for installation on rootless iOS use a deb  value of , to differentiate them from the original  , now referred to by the community as "rootful". The architecture name is misleading - this does not change anything relating to arm64 packages prior to iOS 15. APT and dpkg's excellent support for multiple architectures allows a package to be released simultaneously for both rootful and rootless devices, while retaining the same package identifier and version numbers. APT will only install the version of the package that matches the appropriate architecture, even if it has an older version number, and dpkg will refuse to install a package of an architecture it hasn't been configured to support.

Releasing on a self-hosted repo
To release a rootless package on a self-hosted repo, edit  to declare support for the new architecture:

If your repository have  or   packages, they will be available on both rootless and rootful. As the paths for rootless and rootful are different, this is usually not the desired outcome. In this case, it is recommended that repos/suites for rootless and rootful are seperated.

Zebra currently doesn't check this field, however, Sileo, Cydia, and /  require it to include the device's expected architecture, and will display an error message during refresh if it doesn't.

Once the repository has declared support for the architecture, you can release rootless packages on it just as you would have released a rootful package.

If your package still supports rootful in addition to rootless, you can release both packages on the one repo, even if the package identifier and version number are identical. If you intend to discontinue your rootful package and continue only with rootless, you can likewise continue to use the same package identifier and version numbering. APT knows to ignore packages released for architectures not supported by the device.

Ecosystem support
As can be expected, rootless requires a concerted community effort to fully support. The status of some critical pillars of the community are indicated below.

This list is intended only to document areas of the ecosystem that require attention. Specific tweaks should not be added to this list.