Talk:Evasi0n

Downloads.
Can we delete the downloads and make a version table? Download table is not needed really. --adaminsull (talk) 23:22, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I had the same idea earlier and thought we don't need the links, because they are all on their homepage. But now, the old links are nowhere else visible. Not sure if they are important though. --http (talk) 23:48, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Is it ok for me to delete them and ill do the table for versions too? --adaminsull (talk) 23:55, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I think it'd be better just to add a 'changelog' column to the current downloads table. --Srb21103 (talk) 00:02, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
 * There is totally no point in downloads here. We don't have it for redsn0w etc. --adaminsull (talk) 00:08, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
 * We don't have them for redsn0w because they are saved to the team's Google Drive, but are deleted when a newer version comes out. --5urd (talk) 00:32, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Wait until we get some more response. --5urd (talk) 00:32, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The Mega links still work... --5urd (talk) 00:32, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
 * There is still no point in it. For now I will do the changelog table and see what others think. --adaminsull (talk) 00:37, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
 * For archiving purposes, I usually like having access to older versions of everything. (I probably wouldn't use it though…) However, their usefulness is questionable at best, so it wouldn't really be problematic to remove them. We could purge all of the links for old versions except the Mega links, and move those Mega links below the table or something. -- Dialexio ( talk ) 02:39, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I will just delete all because like we say, they are all useless. You could always google the link if ever needed. --adaminsull (talk) 12:36, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Plus we have the link to their site --C20H25N3O (talk) 19:36, 9 February 2013 (UTC)