User talk:IAdam1n/2013

Edit War - First Warning
On the page IPSW File Format and on Sn0wbreeze you started an edit war. We can't tolerate this here. I don't want to discuss here which version is correct, but if someone undoes your edit, don't change it back, but start a discussion on its Talk page. Only after a public agreement we can then change the page. You did create the talk page, but also changed the page itself. That doesn't stop the edit war. Imagine that everybody, together with a comment on the talk page, would edit the page again. That doesn't work. We want to be civilized here. If you continue with this behaviour, we'll need to block you. As I was involved in these edits, I won't issue the blocking; I don't want to use my admin status to have my version go through. But I'm sure another admin will block you if this goes on. Treat this as a warning. Everybody makes mistakes, just don't repeat them. --http (talk) 13:06, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Ok. I will do that next time. I just dont like things being wrong. --adaminsull (talk) 13:09, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Redirect deletion marks
Do NOT mark a redirect for deletion if it has pages linking to it. It destroys the redirect and instead renders a numerical list like: 1. REDIRECT Template:see also For it to be a redirect, Mediawiki REQUIRES that the first line be  and there be nothing else. --5urd (talk) 00:22, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I didn't want a redirect. --adaminsull (talk) 08:27, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Unlock and Jailbreak edits
Those edits were useful, but weren't put together "nicely". You used a link shortener, not the actual link, and the grammar is bad. Plus, that doesn't seem like the right place for those notes. --5urd (talk) 00:00, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Well, users should know. --adaminsull (talk) 00:38, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Edit War - Second Warning
You just started another edit war by recreating a page that someone deleted. Even if the deletion was not correct, you can't simply change or edit it back (unless the other edit was spam or you're an admin). We don't want this bad behaviour here. If there are different opinions - and none is "better" than any other, just maybe more accepted - then discuss. If this happens a third time, I'll issue a temporary block. Thanks for your understanding. --http (talk) 12:16, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Ok. As I stated on another page, I will in future just wait for a reply. --adaminsull (talk) 12:18, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

STOP
Stop requesting to remove old information. We keep it for historical reasons. It's the same reason blogs don't delete old posts. What if there was a version that worked on Win2k while the newest one doesn't? It would make sense to have the changeling that states that Win2k support is dropped so they know what will work and what won't. This site usually contains information that has sense been remove from the internet. Look at NAND. It contains renders of the storage mapping PDF that has been removed from the internet! What if MuscleNerd didn't raster them? We wouldn't have that document anymore! Old information is still useful. Look at Intel! They still provide the Intel 4004 manual. Is that useful to most people? No. But it provides useful information that could have been lost! Please, stop. --5urd (talk) 16:20, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Ok. I didnt know. --adaminsull (talk) 16:36, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

rowspan and colspan
Please stop ing and  ing everything. Not everything needs it. If it is done to make it consistent with the rest of the page, then it's ok. Other than that, discuss it first. --5urd (talk) 16:22, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Alright. --adaminsull (talk) 16:36, 18 March 2013 (UTC)