Delete
It should stay. That is the name that is output when checking for the bootrom version. --iAdam1n (talk) 23:16, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- Well, the name of this page is still wrong, no matter where you see "ROM". ROM stands for, well, the read-only memory and not for the ROM of a few devices. So it should include a version number. If we don't find it out, because nobody can dump it, then we should try to find an adequate name without having the correct number. But as the page ist still empty (stub), we might also delete it until we know more. --http (talk) 18:36, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
- I say leave it. If/when we find the correct number, then delete this. --iAdam1n (talk) 18:44, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
- Agreed; the name suggests that this might be an article about read-only memory, when it's a mere one or two sentences mentioning the S5L8942 bootrom. However, I do know that my Apple TV 3G doesn't report a bootrom version when checking the usual way. As there doesn't seem to be much information, I'm thinking that this page should be deleted. --Dialexio (talk) 07:01, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
- Well how would you even find the version then? I mean is there another way? --iAdam1n (talk) 18:00, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
- As long as it's not dumped though an exploit, we might never get the correct version. But that also means there is probably nothing to write about it. --http (talk) 09:49, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
- Well how would you even find the version then? I mean is there another way? --iAdam1n (talk) 18:00, 1 November 2013 (UTC)